The Torturers Next Door;
Torturers,
death-squad leaders, and human-rights criminals who seek refuge in the United
States have nothing to fear -- except their victims and former State Department
official Richard Krieger.
By Karen Olsson
THE FIRST TIME OSCAR REYES BACA LAID EYES ON JUAN LOPEZ GRIJALBA was at around 3 a.m. on a warm May night in 1981. Reyes, a journalism professor living with his family in a quiet subdivision of the Honduran capital, Tegucigalpa, had been jolted awake by a blast of automatic rifle fire tearing into the walls of his house. A left-leaning academic in a country controlled by a repressive anti-communist junta, he had been threatened by military officers before. But that night, he says, "we were in shock. It was the first time I was really worried."
The
shooting had barely ended when a government jeep pulled up to the house, and
out stepped a man in uniform. It was Grijalba. Reyes recognized him from
newspaper photographs as one of the regime's top lieutenants. "He was
asking me what happened," he recalls. "He said, `We'll
investigate.' But I didn't expect
anything. In my opinion, he wanted to remind me that I was going to pay."
For more
than a year, things stayed quiet-until, on July 8, 1982, masked men with rifles
stormed Reyes' house. They bound and blindfolded Reyes and his wife, Gloria,
and took them to a house outside the city. Gloria was beaten, stripped naked,
and left to lie on a floor covered in blood, feces, and urine. Later, the
masked men applied electric shocks to her genitals. Oscar was handcuffed with
his arms behind him, then hoisted off the ground by means of a pulley attached
to the handcuffs, "into the air like a pinata," he says. "They
started hitting me with rifle butts. After they got tired of that, they took me
out and did a fake execution in front of a tree. Then they brought me back
inside and said, `Okay, we will kill him another day.'" Off and on, they
questioned him about his neighbors, who they said were Salvadoran guerrilla
sympathizers. Reyes concluded that his torturers were military intelligence
officers-subordinates of Grijalba, by then head of intelligence for the
Honduran armed forces.
Reyes
and his wife remained in custody for five months while their relatives pleaded
with the authorities to spare them. Finally, a judge ordered them released, on
condition that they keep quiet and leave the country.
Reyes'
second encounter with Grijalba came 10 years later. The family had moved to a
suburb of Washington, D.C., and had been granted political asylum; Reyes had
become the editor of a Spanish-language newspaper. At a reception for the
Honduran ambassador, Reyes recalls, "a guy I know said, `Hey, I want to
introduce you to the new military attache,'" and he found himself face to
face with Grijalba. The two men exchanged a quick mucho gusto, then parted
ways.
It was a
chilling encounter, but hardly unique. Over the years, hundreds of human-rights
violators from around the world have found their way to the United States, and
many of them have settled in the same immigrant communities as their former
victims. In 1989, an Ethiopian woman working at an Atlanta hotel discovered
that among her co-workers was the leader of a troop of soldiers who had hung
her from a pole and raped and beaten her during Ethiopia's "Red
Terror" campaign in the '70s. In 1991, a former Cuban political prisoner
recognized Eriberto Mederos, who had tortured him with electric shocks in
Havana, working in a Florida nursing home. An alleged paramilitary squad member
from Bosnia recently emigrated to Burlington, Vermont, where he was spotted by
a Bosnian refugee as soon as he stepped off the plane. Former Haitian
death-squad leader Toto Constant turned up in New York City, trying to sell
real estate to Haitian immigrants in Queens.
According
to a recent report by Amnesty International, as many as 1,000 human-rights
violators from around the world live in the United States. Like the former
Nazis who made headlines in the 1970s and '80s, most of them lead quiet lives
on suburban culs-desac and in gated retirement communities. One Haitian general
implicated in the murder of hundreds of opposition members got a job at Disney
World.
But
unlike former Nazis--who for decades have been subject to a concerted federal
effort to find and deport them--most retired torturers have little to fear from
the U.S. government. The Immigration and Naturalization Service has stepped up
efforts to deport those who violate immigration law, but the agency says it
cannot expel people on human-rights grounds alone. And while the Justice
Department is charged by law with prosecuting human-rights violators in the
criminal courts, the, department has not filed a single such case. Which means
that as long as they keep their heads down and their visas current, most former
torturers can live in the United States, comfortably, for as long as they
choose.
Unless,
that is, they have the bad fortune of being snared by a small but growing
network of victims, private investigators, and human-rights advocates who have
set out to do what the government seldom does-track down human-rights criminals
and bring them to justice. In some instances, their investigations have
convinced the INS to look into an offender's immigration status; in others,
victims have taken their former persecutors to court. In one recent civil case
against two Salvadoran generals accused of supervising the torture and murder
of thousands, a Florida jury awarded more than $50 million to the survivors.
It was
through this informal network that Grijalba's past finally caught up with him.
In 2001, Richard Krieger, an amateur detective who specializes in tracking down
human-rights abusers, noticed Grijalba's name on an alumni list from the School
of the Americas, the controversial U.S. facility whose graduates have included
some of Latin America's most notorious human-rights abusers. A quick check of
public records showed
that
Grijalba was living on Miami's Fontainebleau Boulevard, a winding street of
pastel condominiums and artificial ponds, golf greens, and palm trees. He had
retired there in 1998.
A year
later, INS agents arrived at Grijalba's bungalow with a warrant for his
arrest--for making false statements on his visa application. Grijalba is now
awaiting a judge's ruling on whether he should be deported. He also faces a
civil lawsuit from the Reyeses and four relatives of Hondurans who disappeared
at the hands of the military regime.
IN HIS
NOVEL Autumn of the Patriarch, Gabriel Garcia Marquez describes a cliffside
house where a group of deposed dictators from Latin American and Caribbean countries
while away the hours playing dominoes, reminiscing, and waiting for the day
when they will return to power. Though Garcia Marquez situates that house on an
unnamed tropical reef, one might well imagine it in southern Florida. For
generations, the area has been a
magnet
for out-of-favor elites and military commanders from countries where the United
States once supported autocratic regimes in the name of containing communism.
By one estimate, about 140 suspected human-rights violators live in the region.
Richard
Krieger also came to southern Florida to retire--but instead of working on his
golf game, he has been honing the investigative skills he first learned while
tracking Nazis in the 1970s. From their den in Boynton Beach north of Boca
Raton, Krieger and his wife run a tiny nonprofit dedicated to locating
human-rights abusers who live in the United States. "Either we are a
country that's dedicated to liberty and freedom," he says, "or we are
a country who doesn't care who we deal with and who we give sanctuary to."
So far, he has given the INS dossiers on more than 50 people, 12 of whom have
been arrested.
A
barrel-chested, 69-year-old Bronx native with salt-and-pepper hair, a tan, and
a thin gold chain around his neck, Krieger came to Florida in 1998, after
leaving the State Department, where he served as associate coordinator for
refugee affairs. Traveling to refugee camps around the world, he recalls,
"I found an awful lot of people that really had been through hell just
because they were living in the wrong country at the wrong time. And these guys
who were perpetrating these atrocities, these guys like [Ugandan dictator] Idi
Amin, were going off to live somewhere in comfort, having left millions of
people dead, families slaughtered."
Over the
past three years, Krieger has assembled a kind of national map of thugs--when I
tell him where I live, he answers, "Now in Austin, you have four guys from
Sierra Leone." He refuses to discuss the details of cases, acknowledging
only that he has "a lot of informants, a lot of people who like me and
want to talk to me." And, he notes, offenders aren't necessarily hard to
find. In one case, Krieger obtained a list of 40 human-rights violators who had
been expelled from Canada, then ran some of their names through U.S.
public-records databases. He found 14; all of them, he says, are still in the
United States.
Krieger
pursued his first war criminal 30 years ago--in 1973, when he headed the Jewish
Community Council in Flint, Michigan. One day, he got a call from a reporter,
who told him that Valerian Trifa, a top Nazi collaborator from Romania, was
living in the area. "What are you doing about it?" the reporter
asked. Krieger tracked Trifa down and gave the INS his address, launching what
would be the first in a string of frustrating encounter with the agency.
"The INS did not act," he recalls. In fact, he later learned, the
immigration service had a list of 53 alleged Nazi perpetrators living in the
United States, but had deported only one. It wasn't until 1978 that Congress
required the Justice Department to locate former Nazis and expel them; in the
25 years since, the department has investigated more than 1,600 suspected Nazis
and deported 65.
The
office's purview, however, is limited to World War II-era criminals; other
human-rights abusers are the domain of the National Security Unit, a special
INS office created five years ago to target human-rights criminals who violate
immigration rules. The INS won't say how many cases it has investigated. But
the unit's former director, Walter Cadman, told Amnesty International two years
ago that his staff had a list of nearly 200 suspected perpetrators, and that
more than 30 had been deported.
Advocates
laud the INS for creating the unit but note that its resources are limited--especially
since the same office is also responsible for investigating suspected
terrorists. "The U.S. government is adept at taking people into
custody," Amnesty USA's executive director, William Schulz, said last
year, "as it has shown by its detention of some 1,200 individuals
following the attacks of September 11, the vast majority of whom have been
charged only with visa violations. How ironic that we have been unwilling to
move against people ... who there is good reason to believe are responsible for
far more serious crimes."
FOR MOST
OF THE PAST CENTURY, the United States has been a vocal advocate of prosecuting
war criminals through international law. But last year, the Bush administration
withdrew the U.S. signature from a treaty establishing the International
Criminal Court--the first permanent venue dedicated to prosecuting crimes
against humanity. Administration officials said they feared that U.S. soldiers
could face prosecution overseas; nonetheless, they stressed, the United States would
ensure that "persons wanted or indicted for genocide, war crimes, or
crimes against humanity [could not] seek safe haven on our soil."
In fact,
the U.S. government has not only failed to pursue many human-rights criminals
who found refuge in this country--it has, in numerous cases, helped bring them
here. In 1949, Congress passed the so-called 100 Persons Act, authorizing the
CIA to admit up to 100 people a year "in the interest of national
security," even if those people were war criminals barred from
immigrating. At the time, the CIA sought to recruit Nazi collaborators from
Eastern Europe who could provide information about the Soviets. But the
authorization was never repealed, and as recently as two years ago a
"high-ranking intelligence-community source" confirmed to the
Atlantic Monthly that "on the high end of the spectrum, the director of
the CIA can bring in fifty to a hundred people in the top spy category. Lower
down, you can do everything from a little help around the edges to supplying
visas."
Among
those who appear to have benefited from covert immigration help is a group of
commanders from Haiti, members of the infamous military regime that ruled the
country from 1991 to 1995. An estimated 3,000 to 5,000 civilians died during
that time; a paramilitary group called the Front for the Advancement and
Progress of Haiti (FRAPH), led by Toto Constant, became known for "facial
scalping," skinning victims with machetes. In April of 1994, soldiers and
FRAPH members attacked the fishing village of Raboteau, killing at least 15
people. Later that year the Clinton administration sent troops to the island,
and the junta agreed to step down.
Five
years later, a Haitian court sentenced Constant to life in prison for his role
in the Raboteau massacre. But by then, Constant had moved to Queens and gotten
his real-estate license. The State Department refused to send him back to
Haiti, saying that his presence would jeopardize democracy there. He is still
living in the United States.
Another
of the junta's leaders, Carl Dorelien, came to the attention of his former
victims in Miami's Haitian community in 1997, when he won $3.2 million in the
Florida lottery. At the time, Dorelien said he'd come over on a visa the
American military attache to Haiti had personally delivered to his house. In
all, Dorelien said, 16 former members of the Haitian regime had moved to the
United States. Some of them have since been deported; in January, Dorelien and
former Colonel Hebert Valmond, who had overstayed their visas, were sent back
to Haiti, where they will face trial for their roles in the Raboteau massacre.
"I'm someone who's frequently a critic of the United States
government," says Brian Concannon Jr., a lawyer with the Bureau des
Avocats Internationaux, which has helped bring alleged perpetrators to trial in
Haiti. "But the INS has done a very good job of going after Dorelien and
some other guys."
Still,
most of the former Haitian officials have been able to stay in this country.
One of them, Jean-Claude Duperval, was working at Disney World when Richard
Krieger tracked him down in 2001.
IN
DECEMBER 1980, investigators pulled four bodies from a shallow grave along a
remote road in El Salvador. They were Jean Donovan, Dorothy Kazel, Ita Ford,
and Maura Clarke-three American nuns and a lay worker who had come to El
Salvador to minister to the poor, even as the country's military junta launched
a bloody campaign against leftists and their "sympathizers." The
women had been abducted, raped, and killed by members of El Salvador's national
guard. The murders made headlines around the world.
Thirteen
years later, a truth commission established by El Salvador's new civilian
government issued a report naming dozens of top officials responsible for
atrocities during the late 1970s and early '80s. High on its list were two
generals, Jose Guillermo Garcia and Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova, formerly El
Salvador's defense minister and national guard chief, respectively. But the
truth commission hadn't been able to interview Garcia and Vides Casanova; they
had settled in Florida in 1989, having come to the United States on legal, U.S.
Embassy-issued visas. In 1999, relatives of the churchwomen filed a lawsuit
against Garcia and Vides Casanova, but the men successfully argued that they could
not be held responsible for the actions of rogue subordinates.
By last
summer, however, the generals' luck had run out. They were in court again,
facing claims from three victims of military abuses, including a doctor who had
been tortured in the Salvadoran national guard's headquarters. A jury concluded
that Garcia and Vides Casanova held "command responsibility" over the
crimes. They were ordered to pay their victims $54.6 million.
The
Garcia/Vides Casanova verdict was a watershed, says Patty Blum, a professor of
human-rights law at the University of California-Berkeley who worked on the
case. "A very important aspect was that the three plaintiffs felt their
voices were not singular--was not just them as survivors, but they got to speak
for the voiceless."
In
practice, it is unlikely that the victims will ever collect anywhere near $50
million from the two men. Nor, it appears, will the generals face any other
punishment. Both still live in Florida, and there are no deportation
proceedings against them.
The only
way to fully hold men like Garcia and Vides Casanova accountable, human-rights
advocates argue, is prosecution in criminal court-something the U.S. government
is required by law to pursue, at least in some cases. In 1988, President Reagan
signed the international Convention Against Torture, which obligates member
countries to find, extradite, or prosecute alleged torturers. Congress ratified
it in 1994, along with a law assigning the task of pursuing alleged offenders
to the Justice Department. Since then, human-rights advocates and the INS have
forwarded several dozen names of foreign perpetrators to Justice officials, but
no charges have been filed. The department won't comment on whether it is
investigating any of the cases. Criminal charges could be far more effective in
dealing with human-rights abusers than immigration proceedings, notes William
Aceves, the principal author of last year's Amnesty report and a professor at
California Western School of Law. In criminal trials, the accused could mount a
full-fledged defense and victims would be able to confront their abusers in a
public forum. In the long run, he says, "it would uphold the rule of law
not only in this country, but in the country where the torture
occurred--perhaps even deterring future crimes.
ONE DAY
IN 1996, Gerald Gray, a San Francisco therapist who treats torture survivors,
was contacted by a refugee from Bosnia. The man told him that he had just
spotted one of his torturers--in a photo taken at a local party. "I
realized that this was a problem we never paid attention to," Gray
recalls, "and I really lost my temper. It meant we couldn't really
succeed, that [healing] couldn't be complete if people felt they were still
under threat."
In
response, Gray founded the Center for Justice and Accountability, which helps
torture survivors and relatives of the disappeared sue human-rights violators
in civil court. The center has investigated more than 100 cases, and it has
helped victims file seven lawsuits, including last year's case against the
Salvadoran generals. This year, it expects to face off against Armando
Fernandez Larios, a former Chilean secret agent who is accused of participating
in the "Caravan of Death"--a grisly episode during which a group of
military officers massacred 72 prisoners in a series of cities in northern
Chile. Fernandez Larios has lived in Miami since 1988. Both Chile and Argentina
have asked for his extradition to stand trial on other human-rights charges,
but so far the United States has refused.
Fernandez
Larios' case is unusual, for most human-rights offenders are never charged with
any crimes in their home countries. In some countries, military rulers have
issued amnesties for their associates before leaving office. In others,
civilian governments have established truth commissions with the power to
investigate but not to prosecute.
That's
what happened in Honduras, and it's why a lawsuit in the United States is
probably the only chance Juan Lopez Grijalba's victims will ever have to
confront him in a court of law. Oscar and Gloria Reyes are among those who hope
to take the witness stand once that happens; another plaintiff is Zenaida
Velasquez, whose brother Manfredo was kidnapped by the Honduran military in
1981 and never heard from again.
Velasquez,
who lives in San Jose, California, says she heard about the case through a
friend in Honduras and decided to join in--even though the attorneys warned her
that the process would be long and difficult. "We have always been
complaining about the impunity that these people have been enjoying,"
Velasquez says. "No one has done anything to them, and I don't want to
allow their impunity any longer."
In his
defense, Grijalba has maintained that he didn't directly supervise the officers
involved in torture. His attorney, Kurt Klaus--who also represented the
Salvadoran generals in last year's trial--says the lawsuits amount to
scapegoating. "Who gains from these cases?" he asks. "How does
it go to helping the people of Honduras? The justice system and infrastructure
of those countries need to work, instead of trying to sue a general for
something he did 20 years ago. There's no way it's going to be done years after
the fact. There are too many unbridged gaps in the evidence; the people who
actually did the torture are nowhere to be found; and you get a trial of
experts trying the history of Latin America."
But a
more precise accounting of history, one that publicizes the record and
identifies the perpetrators, is precisely what plaintiffs and their supporters
are after. In the end, says Oscar Reyes, it doesn't so much matter to him
whether Grijalba is tried in the civil suit or whether he is deported first.
"I just want a judge to condemn him on human-rights grounds, either in
court or by him being expelled. I want justice to say this is wrong, what you
did."
Grijalba's
deportation hearings are scheduled to conclude this spring; the witness list,
according to sources familiar with the case, included several former U.S.
military and CIA officials. When Mother Jones sought access to the hearings,
the immigration judge ordered the proceedings closed. The Justice Department
has not responded to a Freedom of Information Act request for information
related to the case. Grijalba, through his immigration attorney, declined to be
interviewed.
For now,
Grijalba remains at the Krome Detention Center in western Miami-Dade
County--dusty, flat territory where the housing developments peter out and
signs for swamp tours and the Miccosukee Indian casino beckon along a narrow
highway. If it weren't for the concertina wire atop the chain-link fence, Krome
could pass for an elementary school from the mid-20th century, a low-rise
complex of cream-colored cinder block and turquoise trim, flanked by
perfunctory green lawns and a large American flag. Inside are cramped
courtrooms, and it was in one of those small chambers that Oscar Reyes saw Juan
Lopez Grijalba for the third time, this past January.
Reyes
had come to testify at Grijalba's deportation hearing, in support of the INS'S
contention that Grijalba should be sent back to Honduras. For close to two
hours he told his tale, sitting in a chair just a few feet away from Grijalba;
at one point the translator--who wasn't occupied because Reyes spoke in
English-began to cry. Grijalba "was very tranquil," Reyes says.
"Sometimes I saw him looking at me. He's older now, with gray hair. He was
wearing jeans and a red-and-blue shin, plain clothes. He's lost weight. In
uniform they are big guys, arrogant, but now he was humble."
(source:
Mother Jones)