|
PRESS
RELEASE Contact:
Joshua Sondheimer, Litigation Director, (415) 544-0444
SAN FRANCISCO -- San Francisco's Center for Justice
& Accountability (CJA) announced Friday, Oct. 5 a $66 million federal
court judgment against former Indonesian Army Chief of Staff Johny
Lumintang for his role in widespread human rights abuses in East
Timor.General Lumintang received
notice Friday of the ruling by United States Magistrate Judge Alan Kay of
the federal district court in Washington, D.C.
In March of this year, Judge Kay heard
three days of testimony from the four surviving plaintiffs and several
expert witnesses in a Washington, D.C. federal courtroom.Two of the victims were killed during the
post-referendum violence.The
plaintiffs were represented by CJA, a San Francisco human rights law
organization, New York’s Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), and the
Washington, D.C. law firm Patton Boggs, LLP. The plaintiffs’ suit focused on
Lumintang’s role in what the court called a “coordinated program of
massive destruction” unleashed by the Indonesian military following the
overwhelming popular vote for independence from Indonesia in a 1999
U.N.-sponsored referendum. The court found that Lumintang, as Army
Vice Chief of Staff at the time, was responsible for scrutinizing army
operations, strategic planning, and military discipline.The court also noted that Lumintang
issued a telegram to Army troops viewed as signaling the campaign of
violence, and that he signed a training manual distributed to troops in
East Timor that included instructions in abduction, killing, kidnapping,
and terror. "It has been established . . . that
Lumintang has responsibility for the actions against plaintiffs and a
larger pattern of gross human rights violations," wrote Judge Kay."[H]e - along with other high-ranking
members of the Indonesian military - planned, ordered, and instigated acts
carried out by subordinates to terrorize and displace the East Timorese
population ... and to destroy East Timor's infrastructure following the
vote for independence." East Timor, formerly a Portuguese
colony, was occupied by the Indonesian military in 1975.The United States and the international
community refused to recognize Indonesian rule over the island nation,
which occupies half of the island of Timor, north of Australia. The violence by the Indonesian military
and related militia was widely viewed as an effort to overturn the results
of the independence referendum, and to discourage popular independence
movements in other Indonesian provinces.In what the court called a “coordinated
program of massive destruction” by these forces, over 2,000 East Timorese
lost their lives, and 70-80 percent of the country’s infrastructure was
destroyed.Some 240,000 persons, one
third of the population, fled from their homes and were forcibly relocated
to the Indonesian province of West Timor. CJA hailed the court’s ruling as an
important victory for the people of East Timor and sends an important
message to human rights violators around the world."The tragic events of September 11 have
reminded us all of the horror of attacks on innocent civilians.The court reaffirmed that defendant bears
responsibility under U.S. and international law for his role in such
attacks against civilians in East Timor," said CJA’s Joshua Sondheimer, an
attorney for the plaintiffs."The
court's ruling sends a message that if those responsible for attacks
against civilians wish to enter the United States, they will be held
accountable in our courts." The court’s decision comes on the heels
of the first independent parliamentary elections in East Timor on August
30, 2001, and a state visit to Washington, D.C. weeks ago by new
Indonesian President Megawati Sukarnoputri. The case against Lumintang is the only
one brought in any country or jurisdiction against an Indonesian commander
for the systematic destruction and violence that followed the independence
referendum.General Lumintang, who
was served with court papers during a visit to the Washington, D.C. area,
chose not to defend himself in court.After he failed to respond to plaintiffs’
claims, which included charges of crimes against humanity, summary
execution and torture, a judge declared Lumintang in
default. While there has been a movement to
establish an international tribunal to judge human rights crimes committed
in East Timor on the model of the tribunals established for Rwanda and the
former Yugoslavia, the U.N. has yet to authorize such a court.The Indonesian government recently issued
a decree establishing a special Human Rights Court for East Timor in
Indonesia.However, human rights
groups say the effort falls far short of addressing the Indonesian
military’s responsibility for the violence in East Timor, as it allows
review of events only from August and September 1999 in 3 out of 13
districts. Plaintiffs who traveled to Washington
to testify in the proceedings included: --a 30-year-old man who was shot by
Indonesian soldiers and subsequently needed to have his foot
amputated; --a 27-year old who was threatened with
death after being abducted by the military, and whose brother was killed
and father injured in post-election attacks; and --a mother whose son was killed and
whose home was destroyed by Indonesian soldiers. In 1992, a judgment for $14 million was
issued in a similar case against Indonesian General Sintong Panjaitan for
his involvement in the November 12, 1991, massacre of over 270 East
Timorese during a funeral at the Santa Cruz cemetery in East Timor. The Lumintang lawsuit, like the
Panjaitan case, is based on two U.S. laws, known as the Alien Tort Claims
Act and the Torture Victim Protection Act, that allow victims of grave
human rights violations committed abroad to bring suit in federal court
against the perpetrators or commanders responsible.Lawsuits can only go forward if the
defendant is served legal papers while in the United
States.
|
|||||||||