_files/image001.gif)
August 24,
2004
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=554530
The archbishop, the death squad and the 24-year wait for
justice
It was the crime that
broke El
Salvador's heart. A good man was murdered in
broad daylight, yet no attempt was made to bring his assassin to justice. Until today.
Andrew Buncombe
reports:
It is a warm Monday evening in
spring and in the Chapel of Divine Providence in El Salvador's capital city, San Salvador, a small, bespectacled priest is performing
Mass. Having
completed his sermon, the priest is standing close to the altar, blessing the
wafer discs that represent the body of Christ.
From the rear of the church
there is the sound of a single shot. The priest crumples to the floor of the
chapel fatally wounded, blood seeping from a small hole in his chest and soaking
his vestments. Outside the small chapel, a bearded man armed with a .223
high-velocity weapon, is seen in the back seat of a red, four-door Volkswagen
which then drives away.
The priest was Oscar Arnulfo Romero, the Archbishop of El Salvador and an
outspoken champion of the poor, and he was assassinated by right-wing
paramilitaries, on 24 March 1980. Though the identity of the assassin remains
unknown, many of the alleged conspirators have long been identified and live on
untouched, a sore that has continued to fester within Salvadoran
society.
Now, more than 24 years later,
a court in California will today hear evidence against
one of those accused of orchestrating the murder of Archbishop Romero. That man,
Alvaro Rafael Saravia, the right-hand man to the leader of El Salvador's death
squads of the 1980s, has lived in the US for the past 19 years but has not been
seen in public since papers were filed against him last September. The hearing
will be held in his absence.
The civil action is designed to
establish Mr Saravia's
alleged complicity in the killings and seek damages against him. Archbishop
Romero often spoke critically of the US, which supported the right-wing government of
El
Salvador and those of other Latin American
countries in their so-called "dirty wars", training and funding paramilitary
forces.
Among those trained by the
US was Mr
Saravia's boss, the late Major Roberto D'Aubuisson who
is said to have ordered the archbishop's assassination. He studied at the
notorious School of the Americas, a US military college in Fort Benning, Georgia, which for decades taught
counter-insurgency to more than 60,000 cadets from Latin American regimes, It
was renamed in 2001 after a series of scandals, including the discovery there of
stacks of torture manuals.
Esther Chavez worked with the
archbishop in El Salvador and
fled to New
Jersey when she was threatened by death squads after his
assassination. She said: "[This trial] is very important not only at a personal
level, but for Salvadorans. Even though it took 24 years, justice is
prevailing."
Ms Chavez is among witnesses
who will give evidence to the hearing in Fresno, held after a lawsuit was brought by the
San Francisco-based Centre for Justice and Accountability (CJA). The group says
it will introduce new evidence including testimony from an as-yet-unidentified
witness who will attest to Mr Saravia's involvement in the killing.
Matt Eisenbrant, the CJA's litigation
director, who is serving as co-counsel, said: "The US should not be
a safe haven for those responsible for this heinous crime. This is the first
trial [in regard to] the assassination. For a long time it was too dangerous to
do anything in El Salvador, and since 1993 there has been an amnesty law which means
you cannot do anything there. Then we found Saravia was living in California."
The death of Archbishop Romero,
63, was a seminal event, not only for El Salvador but for international
followers of his liberation theology, a radical interpretation of the Gospels
which tried to reconcile Marxist philosophy and Christian social thinking. At
his funeral, more than 40 people were shot dead by government soldiers firing on
the huge crowds of poor people paying homage to their champion outside the
city's cathedral.
A quarter of a century on, even
in death, Archbishop Romero remains a powerful and influential figure. Thousands
of pilgrims travel to San
Salvador to visit his tomb, and the small, three-room
house in which he lived, next to the chapel on the grounds of a hospital. He has
also been nominated for recognition by the Vatican as a
saint.
The present Archbishop of El
Salvador, Fernando Saenz Lacalle, a member of the
right-wing Catholic sect Opus Dei and politically very different from Archbishop
Romero, has said this trial could help justify the move. In a letter obtained by
The Independent, he wrote: "I consider it a positive development that the murder
of my illustrious predecessor is being investigated. More information about the
author or authors of this sacrilegious murder and about the circumstances under
which it was carried out will provide valuable information to the movement for
his beatification."
An investigation by a UN Truth
Commission in 1992 concluded that the murder had been ordered by Mr D'Aubuisson, who led a network of death squads. It also
concluded that Mr Saravia and others were "actively
involved in planning and carrying out the assassination". The UN investigators
found Mr Saravia had ordered his driver, Amado Garay, to drive the gunman
to the chapel.
Mr Garay, who fled El Salvador shortly after the
killing, saw the shooting. He said that three days later, he had driven Mr Saravia to a house, and his chief had told Mr D'Aubuisson there: "We've already done what we planned
about killing Monsignor Arnulfo Romero." An
investigation into the killing - based partly on a diary found on Mr Saravia that contained notes about the conspiracy to kill
Archbishop Romero - was launched by Judge Ramirez Amaya until he too was forced to flee the country after
death threats. He will also appear as a witness this week.
Records show Mr Saravia has been living in the US since 1985, first in Florida, then in Modesto, California. He was detained in 1987 by the
US authorities after Salvadoran
prosecutors sought his extradition. That extradition was later withdrawn by the
Supreme Court of El Salvador in a decision that the truth commission said was
"dubious and politically motivated". He was released from US custody in
1988.
Mr Saravia
has never been charged over the murder of the archbishop. Mr D'Aubuisson, who went on to form the National Republican
Alliance, considered to be the political arm of the death squads, was later
accused of Archbishop Romero's killing but was not charged. He died in 1992,
still denying guilt.
Lawyers are bringing the action
under the 1991 Torture Victim Protection Act which allows suits to be brought
against foreign nationals accused of summary killings and torture. They said
they delivered legal papers to Mr Saravia's address but he had "gone to
ground".
Mr Eisenbrant said he hoped the civil action could lead to
either the US Justice or Immigration departments
bringing charges. It is understood Mr Saravia entered
the US on a six-month tourist visa. "This
lawsuit has unquestionably disrupted Saravia's life,"
he said. "And it ensures he cannot live openly in the US for fear his
victims could seize his assets and he could be arrested and prosecuted for
alleged immigration violations." Nico van Aelstyn, a
partner with the law firm Heller, Ehrman, White and
McAuliffe, who is helping to bring the case, said: "The assassination of
Archbishop Romero was one of the most outrageous single crimes of the last
quarter of the 20th century. Given that one of the [suspects] has lived in the
US for [at least] 17 years, we
Americans have an obligation to bring him to justice. We hope this lawsuit will
encourage additional witnesses to come forward with evidence that will enable
the courts to bring to justice all those responsible for the
crime."
Archbishop Romero had been
leading the struggle for human rights in El Salvador when
the recently imposed junta, headed by Jose Napoleon Duarte Fuentes, of the Partido Democrata Cristiano (Christian Democratic Party, PDC) was mounting a
bloody counter-insurgency campaign, nominally against the revolutionary forces
of the FMLN, but essentially against all political dissidents. From that time to
1992, more than 75,000 civilians were killed by the military and paramilitary
death squads closely linked to the troops.
Archbishop Romero had been
outspoken against such terror. A month before his death he wrote to then
US President Jimmy Carter, asking him
to suspend financial aid for the country. Mr Carter,
who sent millions in aid and riot equipment to the Salvadoran military and
dispatched US trainers to help them, suspended
support months later, but only after paramilitaries murdered four
nuns.
Robert White, the former
US ambassador to
El
Salvador, had heard Archbishop Romero preach
the day before his death. Then the priest appealed directly to the soldiers
involved in the killings. "Brothers, you came from your own people," he told
them. "You are killing your own brothers. The Church cannot remain silent before
such an abomination. In the name of God, I implore you, I beg you, I command you, 'Stop the killing'."
Mr White
said last week: "I really worried about him and his forthrightness. There were
limits to how far you could go. I would have preferred that he would have been
more prudent."
Archbishop Romero has two
brothers, Tiberio, 77, and 74-year-old Santos. Both have recently
travelled to California. "We try to give testimony to our
brother's life and live our lives the best we can, with humility and honesty,"
Tiberio told The Tidings, the weekly paper of the
archdiocese of Los
Angeles.
Marie Dennis, one of the
authors of Oscar Romero: Reflections on His Life and Writings, said she believed
the hearing in California would remind people of his role as
a champion of the poor. "I think he represented just the best there is," she
said. "He actually started out conservative. It took a while to see the way in
which the political powers and economic powers were creating a [situation] that
was exploiting the people. As soon as he saw how that power was perpetuated he
became very clear."
Archbishop Romero often talked
of sacrifice. In his final sermon on that Monday evening, moments before the
gunman's bullet struck, he had reminded the two dozen or so gathered to
celebrate Mass, of Christ's parable of wheat.
"Those who surrender to the
service of the poor through love of Christ, will live
like the grains of wheat that dies," he said. "It only apparently dies. If it
were not to die, it would remain a solitary grain. The harvest comes because of
the grain that dies ... We know that every effort to improve society, above all,
when society is so full of injustice and sin, is an effort that God blesses,
that God wants, that God demands of
us."