| |
|
Alien
Tort Statute Resources The first case brought under the ATS for human rights abuses was
Filartiga v. Peña-Irala. In 1976, the father of a young man
who had been tortured and killed in Paraguay while in police custody
saw the police inspector involved in his son's torture and killing
walking the streets of Manhattan. The father called the INS, and the
INS arrested the police inspector for overstaying his visitor's visa.
The father and sister brought a claim against the inspector, and in
1980, the U.S. court in New York upheld their claims, opening the
way for other claims using the Alien Tort Statute to be brought. The U.S. has argued that these cases would interfere with foreign investment and with our foreign relations, and that the centuries-old law under which these suits have been brought does not permit victims to bring human rights claims in U.S. courts. The U.S. position today marks a radical departure from its initial position on human rights lawsuits in U.S. courts. In the landmark 1980 Filartiga case, in which a federal court first recognized that foreign torture could be punished under the Alien Tort Statute, the Department of Justice submitted a legal brief stating that refusing to recognize a private cause of action under the law "might seriously damage the credibility of our nation's commitment to the protection of human rights." The department stated that when the stringent conditions of the law are satisfied, "there is little danger that judicial enforcement will impair our foreign policy efforts." For a list of State Depatment briefs and statements submitted in recent cases click here.
|
|


